Blowing the Bridges at Mons 23/24 Aug 1914

Introduction

Having now arrived and settled into Mons, it has been a case of get out and look at the Great War History on my doorstep and it is pretty much on my door step.

There is a lot about the first and last shots of the war, and also the defence of the Canal and all of the actions that come with that – From a Sapper point of view the winning of 2 VCs for the actions on the 23 Aug is a big deal. But there is more to this, a lot more in fact and it also involves the Mounted Sappers of the Field Sqn RE.

Depending on what book you look at or who you talk to there are between 18-22 “bridges” across the canals that formed the BEF line of defence on the 23-24 Aug 1914.

Why the difference in numbers?

The canal had road bridges, rail bridges, foot bridges, locks, locks with bridges and some double bridges (bridges over the canal and directly linked a second bridge over a smaller drainage canal/ channel on the south side). With reference the locks not all were classed as a crossing -even though it would be possible for men on foot to cross. So you can see that there is a whole range of Structures that cross the Canals and offer a means of access from one side to the other.

I will look at what happened to them and who had responsibilities for them. I’ll go through the actions at the bridges moving East to west as that generally matches the the actions with the enemy as they approached the canal line.

Points to note

One of the points that is clear from reading the accounts, the war diaries and also some of the reference books is that there is not enough explosives held by the Sapper Field units for the task at hand, that becomes very clear as soon as the various units see the task at hand.

  • A Field Company RE would have 560 Slabs of wet Gun Cotton (1 lb each) and 720 primers (1 oz dry gun cotton packages)
  • The Field Sqn RE would be better provided for with 1120 Slabs of wet Gun Cotton (1 lb each) and 1920 primers (1 oz dry gun cotton packages),

It is also noted that while the Officers and Sappers of the units know demolitions and have been trained in it, they are not well practised in it. This is pointed out by Lt Gen Buckland in his 1932 article for the RE Journal and Capt EW Cox RE’s lecture to the Senior Officers Course at the SME, Chatham and recorded in the RE Journal Sep 1913. Cox points out that during the pre war exercises of 1911 the Field Troops are well practised in Water Supply and River Crossings, the demolition tasks tended to be cutting railway lines rather than bridge demolitions but are not close to be experts n the task.

Cox also pointed out that the quantity of explosives held by the Field Troops was too little and that there was no first line resupply – it would be interesting to know if his recommendation of a 100% resupply of demolition stores be carried with the Artillery Battery ammunition supply in each Brigade was ever taken up.

Another thing to note is that the view of the French Commander, General Joffre, was that this was going to be an “offensive” operation and as such no demolition plan was developed by either the British or the French in the event that they may have to withdraw, this failing cause a lot of problems for the BEF as it retreated from Mons back into France.

The last point to note is that in Horsfall & Cave’s book “Mons 1914” they state that just prior to the outbreak of war that a fault is identified with the in-service Instantaneous Fuse and it is withdrawn from service and only limited replacements items were available. As such the RE Field units had to rely on the Electric Exploder equipment of which there was only one per Field Section (remember this is a 40 man troop in modern parlance) and per Field Troop, and Safety Fuse. I have to state none of the other references mention this, I had hoped that the RE History Volume 5 may mention it but it doesn’t, but bearing in mind it was written in 1953 from war diaries, notes and memories, it doesn’t surprise me, but to support this every reference talks about the exploder and safety fuse and no mention of instantaneous fuse. it’s not mentioned in the war diaries as the equipment recall occurred just prior to the declaration of war, which is the marker for the start of unit war diaries.

3 Division’s Area – Obourg, Nimy, Jemappes and Mariette.

The Canal area that covered Mons (the Eastern and Northern side)was covered by units of 3 Div, this was also the responsibility of the 2 Field Companys Royal Engineers of that Division:

  • 56 Field Company Royal Engineers
  • 57 Field Company Royal Engineers.

56 Field Company RE covered the Eastern Crossings from Obourg round to Nimy. When given the task the OC of 56 Fld Coy RE he carried out a recce of the crossings and quickly identified that he did not have nearly enough explosives to deal with the types of crossing points. He dispatched men into Mons to try and get more explosives either from Military or civilian sources. He was also told that he was not to start any demolition work until 0630hrs on the 23 Aug 14.

Unfortunately by the time that 56 Field Company sappers move upto the crossings and bridges the Germans were already pressing down on the 3 crossings in the Obourg area.

*A Personal Take – while it could be said that the crossings could have been prepared with the unit holdings of explosives there were a number of factors that should be considered.

All of the crossings are substantial items of engineering and would need a significant quantity of explosives.

The limited availability of Fuse Instantaneous and the numbers of electrical exploders made the task difficult.

The time at which 56th Fld Coy were tasked was late and the Germans were already pressing down so that the demolitions would need to be “hasty” demolition tasks rather than “deliberate” and as such they would require significantly more explosives to achieve the required effect. (According to the Field engineering manual 1911, hasty demolitions should add a factor of 50% onto all calculated explosives)

The crossings that 56 Fld Coy RE had to deal with in the 4th Middlesex area were:

  • Lock No 4
  • Road Bridge to Obourg, next to the Railway station.
Road bridge at Obourg Station.
  • Lock No 5

In some cases the locks on the Canal do have a bridges incorporated, but for some they do not but can still provide a crossing point for infantry when they are in the closed position.

Due to the weight of fire from the Germans on the eastern bank and the high ground it was not possible to prepare any these crossings for demolition and all of the crossings were captured intact.

Moving up into the 9th Brigade area at Nimy there were a further 4 crossing points that were also the responsibility of 56 Fld Coy RE.

  • The Bridge on the Rue Des Bragnons. This Connected the villages of Nimy and Maisieres. This was a lifting bridge with the lifting gear on the Maisieres side (Northern Bank/Enemy side).
  • Swing Road Bridge at Nimy
  • Nimy Railway Bridge. This was a metal construction bridge.

Lt Holt RE and his Section (a Troop in modern parlance) were attempting to install demolitions onto the Rue Des Bragnons Bridge when the Germans rushed the bridge. Lt Holt was shot and injured and his section was captured. Lt Holt soon died of his wounds and has the unfortunate claim to fame of being the first Royal Engineer to be killed in the Great War.

The next 2 bridges (The Swing Bridge and the Railway Bridge) were the responsibility of Lt AF Day RE and his section. Lt Day did not have enough explosive to destroy both bridges. The swing bridge had been rotated open and secured on the South Bank (Nimy) and the metal railway bridge was being defended by Machine Guns of the 4th Royal Fusiliers.

Lt Dease & Pte Godley of the 4th Middlesex defend the railway bridge, Dease would die of his wounds, both were awarded the VC.

Both bridges were under heavy enemy fire and Lt Day took cover with the hope that the opportunity may present itself to allow him and his sappers to get onto the railway bridge to install the demolition charges. Unfortunately there were no opportunities and Lt Day was wounded and soon after was captured once the Germans crossed the bridges.

The Germans captured both of these bridges intact.

The last of the crossing points in the 56 Fld Coy RE area was Lock No 6, having read several accounts there is no suggestion that this lock had any form of bridge, so the assumption is that this was just a lock and would have been simply opened with the mechanism either locked or damaged to prevent closing.

The next series of crossings were allocated to 57 Fld Coy RE.

  • The Ghlin Road bridge (1000 yards west of lock No 6)
  • Railway Bridge (500 yards west of the Ghlin Bridge)

Both of these bridges were the responsibility of Cpl A Payne and 6 sappers. On both of the bridges charges were laid but due to not having an electric exploder they would both require to be initiated using Safety Fuse. This created its own particular challenge as it required the bridges to be initiated with equal lengths of safety fuse. Despite this challenge Cpl Payne and his sappers successfully destroyed both bridges. (Note- the reason why the safety fuse needed to be of an equal length is that if one side detonates before the other side there is a chance that the blast would shift or blow the other charges off the structure before they detonated, the result would mean a partial demolition)

Moving on into the next battalion area – 1st Royal Scots Fusiliers, this is the start of the Conde Canal and the Battalion had a 2000 yard frontage of canal to defend. This was still 57 Fld Coy RE area of responsibility.

The Crossings are:

  • Lock No 1
  • Lifting Road Bridge at the Gas Poste
  • Lock No 2, this has a bridge crossing as part of it’s construction.
  • Lifting Road Bridge at Jemappes
the Lifting Road Bridge at Jemappes in the open position
Lifting Road bridge at Jemappes in the closed position

Lock No 1 had no bridge and as such it was opened and fixed in position.

the Gas Poste lifting road bridge was prepared for dems by Lt Boulnois RE and Sgt Smith and successfully blown using the Section’s Electric exploder. With this bridge destroyed, Lt Boulnois and Sgt Smith dashed onto deal with the other bridges.

Lock No2 was being dealt with by LCpl Jarvis and his sappers and some of the Royal Scots Fusiliers, at this time they were under fire and Cpl Jarvis ordered his men to get back while he finished fixing the charges, working from a row boat he was assisted by Private Heron of the RSF. Despite the enemy fire the charges were set and Jarvis completed the demolition. For this action under fire he was awarded the Victoria cross and Heron was awarded the DCM.

An artists impression of Jarvis fixing charges on the Lock no 2 bridge but it seems to have omitted Private Heron who was working the boat for Jarvis.

while this was going on the 3 Div CRE’s adjutant – Capt Wright RE was helping the sappers by moving stores and explosives using his motor car, having met with Lt Boulnois and Sgt Smith after they had blown the lifting bridge they made a decision that Sgt Smith would take the Electric Exploder and a drum of cable and go with Capt Wright to deal with the Lifting bridge at Mariette in the next battalions area, while Lt Boulnois would head to the Lifting Road Bridge at Jemappes.

The Jemappes bridge had been prepared by Cpl Halewood and his sappers, the limited availability of the electric exploders meant that Sapper ingenuity had come into play. several of the houses in Jemappes near to the canal had an electricity supply and between Cpl Halewood and Lt Boulnois it was worked out that they could wire the demolitions into the lighting circuit of one of the houses and by quickly flicking on the light they could provide a suitable power source to set off the explosives. As the last British troops crossed back over the bridge under German fire Lt Boulnois flicked the switch at the very moment that the power to the village failed. The bridge could not be blown and The Sapper dems team had to withdraw with the infantry.

The last bridge in the 3 Division area was in the Northumberland Fusiliers area

  • Lifting Road bridge at Mariette.

This was a double bridge as at various sections along the south side of the canal there was a deep drainage channel. The canal bridge was 60′ wide with the lifting mechanism on the northern bank, and the bridge over the drainage channel was 20′. The canal bridge had been prepared for demolition with the electrical wires on the tow path.

below is a sketch map taken from the Northumberland Gunner Website showing the layout of the Northumberland Fusiliers in Mariette and the position of the bridge, tow path and the drainage channel.

http://northumbriangunner.blogspot.com/2014/03/mons-mariette.html

The bridge was under heavy fire and it was necessary to connect the cables on the tow path with the cables, that Sgt Smith had brought with him, to the electric exploder. To do so would mean being exposed to enemy fire, so Capt Wright attempted to cross the drainage channel bridge from underneath by going hand over hand from the girders. unfortunately a head wound sustained earlier when he was near LCpl Jarvis’s demolition site had severely weakened him and after several attempts he fell into the drainage channel and had to be rescued by Sgt Smith. Unfortunately the bridge couldn’t be blown and Smith and Wright were forced to withdraw with B Company of the Northumberland Fusiliers. Wright would receive the VC for his efforts on this day.

An Artist’s take on Capt Wright trying to connect the wires to the charges – Clearly the artist was more familiar with English canal bridges than those on the Mons-Conde Canal.
Another Artists impression of Capt Wright’s efforts, but equally created with a bit of poetic licence.

5 Division’s Area – St Ghislain, Les Herbieres, and Pommeroeul

This Division area was the responsibility of the Division’s 2 Field Companies:

  • 17 Field Company RE
  • 59 Field Company RE

The first section of the Canal in the 5 Div area was a 3000 yard stretch that was the responsibility of 1st Bn Queens own Royal West Kents. This section covered the small town of St Ghislain and had 3 Bridges, these were the responsibility of 17 field Company RE

  • Fixed Iron Railway bridge
  • Bridge at Lock No 3
  • Lifting Road bridge

The 3 bridges in this area had been well prepared for demolition but they were finished while under direct fire, but by the evening all charges were secured and the cables running back to a well placed firing position However but the railway bridge came under shell fire and some of the gun cotton charges were blown off from the beams and girders. Cpl Marsden attempted to fix them back in place but was killed before he could finish the task. 2nd Lt Godsell and Sgt Payne detonate the demolition with the electrical exploder and the bridge is successfully blown.

The bridge at Lock 3 is blown by Cpl Gerachty and the heavy iron lifting road bridge is successfully blown by Cpl Taylor.

the next section of canal is a 1000 yard frontage and manned by the 2nd Bn KOSB, this has one bridge at Les Herbieres.

  • Iron Road bridge at Lock No 4

this bridge is prepared for demolition by Lt Pottinger and his section of 17 Field Company RE. The order to blow the bridge is given and the Electrical Exploder fails to function. after several attempts it is realised that the exploder has a fault inside and it isn’t possible to now attach safety fuse. However this doesn’t stop Lt Pottinger attempting to shoot that the detonators with his webley in the hope that that may set of the explosives. this wasn’t an act of desperation as such, as Lt Pottinger was an Army champion shot with the revolver. Unfortunately his efforts came to naught and the bridge had to be left intact while the Sappers and Infantry withdrew under fire.

17 Field company RE also sank an number of canal barges, using 1 lbs of gun cotton at the keel, to prevent them being used as improvised crossings.

The next section of canal was in the responsibility of 1st Bn East Surrey Regt of 14 Brigade and the bridges were the responsibility of 59 Field Company RE. there was 2 bridges in the Surrey’s area and these were the responsibility of 1 Section under the command of Lt Pennycuick RE

  • Fixed Railway bridge (Plate Girder construction)
  • Double Road Bridge – a Fixed bridge over a drainage channel and a lift bridge over the Canal, known as the Pont D’Hautrage

Both of these bridges were successfully blown, from all of the references and articles there is no mention on how these were detonated or whether they were under fire.

The final section of the 5 Div area was defended by the 1st Bn Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry. There were 2 bridges on this section of the Canal and they were the responsibility of Lt Flint and No3 section of 59 Field Company RE.

  • Lifting Bridge on the Pommeroeul to Thulin Road
  • Wooden Bridge at Lock No 5.

While these bridges were being prepared for demolition the CO of 1 DCLI voiced concern that his battalion may end up being stuck as there was a small river that ran parallel with the canal, approximately 600 yards to the south. To lessen the risk a section from 59 Field Company RE build a pontoon bridge to provide a crossing for the Battalion.

The problem that Lt Flint and his sappers had was that their bridges were under direct fire from a German Field Gun situated a mile to the north of them. despite this, both Bridges were successfully blown. The Pontoon Bridge provided a key lifeline for the DCLI but unfortunately it could not be stripped out as time did not allow and had to be destroyed to deny the Germans a crossing point.

19 Brigade Area – Pommeroeul to Conde

The area west of Lock No 5 across to Conde was initially covered by the regiments of the Cavalry Brigades, they had pushed forward and the Brigades were supported by 2 & 3 Field Troop RE of the Field Squadron RE (Note – it was not numbered at this point as it was the only RE Field Squadron, it would be another 2 weeks until 2nd Field Squadron was created and at that point it would take on the number of 1st Fd Sqn RE)

the cavalry would be relieved by Infantry of 19 Brigade at about 1530hrs on the 23 Aug, this would allow more of them to push forward to recce and to engage the Germans. The Field Troops had responsibility for 5 Bridges which they had been preparing for demolition for most of the afternoon. 3 of the bridges were to the south of Pommeroeul and the other 2 were further west at the village of St Aybert.

Pommeroeul –

  • A Lift Bridge over the Canal
  • slightly west of the above bridge – A metal Lift Bridge over the Canal
  • Wooden bridge over the river just to the south of the above bridge

St Aybert –

  • A Lift bridge at the east end of the village
  • A Girder Bridge in the middle of the village

by 1530hrs B Company 1st Middlesex Regt had moved up to the Canal and were now in place and supporting the RE Troops working at the bridges.By 1630hrs the Bridges were under heavy fire from the Germans of 8 Division. The eastern bridge is not destroyed until British cavalry units have returned over it and it is blown at 1715hrs with the other 2 Pommeroeul bridges destroyed shortly after.

The bridges at St Ayberts are held for longer to allow the 6th Dragoons Guards to withdraw over the Canal. The last of the 6 DG cross the Bridges at about 0230hrs on the 24th Aug and the Field Troop blows both bridges at 0300hrs. Both Field Troops withdrew back to the Sqn HQ at Quievrain and would then start the Retreat.

The current Girder Bridge at the same spot of the Girder bridge destroyed at 0300hrs 24 Aug 1914 by one of the RE Field Troops

Conclusion

This has been an interesting project to dig into, particularly as it has such an important part played by 2 Mounted Sapper Units, of which I’ll do a bit more of a detailed posting. As for the other units it is interesting to see that there is a real mixed bag of results.

That isn’t a criticism, every unit was carrying out demolitions while under fire, with not enough explosives, limited electric exploders and next to no instantaneous fuse. Add to that the order for 56 Field Company RE not start preparing Demolitions until 0630hrs on the 23rd Aug – a whole night lost, and then the enemy were were on top of you before you start!

I’ve tried to get as many old photos of the bridges as I can, and when you look at the range of bridge type, construction and materials it is clear that that the Sappers worked bloody miracles with the resources and time available to blow as many bridges as they did. There has been a real mix of bravery and madness to be found as you move from each bridge and lock.

Hopefully I’ve managed to add a bit more to the Battle of Mons than the usual stories of the first shots of the Great War and winning of the first VCs of the war (not to take anything away from those stories) but I wanted to look at a very sapper aspect of the battle.

References:

RE Field Sqn War Diary 22 Aug 1914 – 1 Sep 1914

59 Field Coy RE, War Diary, 22 Aug 1914- 1 sep 1914

Capt EW Cox RE “Field Troops – A lecture delivered to No3 Senior Officers’ Class, SME” The Royal Engineers Journal, September 1913

Maj Gen Sir Reginald Buckland “Demolitions Carried Out at Mons and during the retreat, 1914”, The Royal Engineers Journal, March 1932

2Lt KB Godsell RE (17 Fld Coy RE) “The First Month of World War 1 – extract of Personal notes jotted down by the wayside”, The Royal Engineers Journal, March 1974

Jack Horsfall & Nigel Cave ” Mons 1914″, Pen and Sword Publishing, 2000

David Lomas, ” Mons 1914, The BEF’s Tactical Triumph” Campaign Series, Osprey Publishing, 8th Impression 2008

Jon Cooksey & Jerry Murland ” The Retreat from Mons 1914: North, Casteau to Le Cateau”, Battle Lines Series, Pen and Sword Publishing, 2014

Andrew Rawson, “British Expeditionary Force, The 1914 Campaign”, Pen and Sword Publishing, 2014

“The History of the Corps of Royal Engineers Volume 5, The Home front, France, Flanders and Italy in the First World War”, Institution of Royal Engineers, 1952.

“The Royal Engineers Field Service Pocket Book” Third Edition, The Royal Engineers Institution, 1916

General Staff, War Office, “Manual of Field Engineering, 1911” HMSO, Reprint 1914

General Staff, War Office, “Field Service Regulations Part 1, Operations, 1909”, HMSO, Reprint 1914

General Staff, War Office, “Yeomanry and Mounted Rifle Training Parts 1 and 2, 1912” HMSO, Reprint 1914

General Staff, War Office, “Field Service pocket Book, 1914 with Amendments 1916”, HMSO, 1917

Posted in History | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Preperation for Moving to Mons

I’m down to a month until I move to my new job in Belguim and the accommodation that I’ve been allocated puts me right next to so much of the history of August 1914.

So what is the plan? While I will be coming back to the Estate on a regular basis, one of the first plans is to look at what the movements and the routes were of the RE Field Sqn of the Cavalry Division.

The Squadron had responsibility for 3 bridges over the Canal to the west of Mons, which were blown. for the next few days they then moved back with the Cavalry eventually ended up south of Le Cateau before reforming with the Cavalry Division.

A lot of the work they had been tasked with during the retreat was Demolitions, creating Cavalry tracks to improve mobility and also fortifing villages to provide defensive positions for rear guard units to hold back. delay the advancing Germans.

It is going to beinteresting to see, using the war diaries as the guide, what the distances that were covered and also the route.

Rest asured there will be photos and also a post showing what I find on the route.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Origin of the Garrison Engineer

As many of you know I am a Garrison Engineer (Construction), which is basically a commissioned Clerk of Works (Construction). But what is the origin of the Garrison Engineer?

The general practise of the 1700s and early 1800s was to keep a small standing army and to increase the army’s size in times of war. Most of these troops would be billeted with the local population and then demobilised after the war. After Waterloo the army was reduced back down but was bigger than it had been prior to the peninsular war. The intention was that with this force they would build some barracks to accommodate the soldiers and therefore reduce the burden on the local population. The construction of these barracks was mainly put out to civilian contract.

In 1828 the Barracks question was raised in Parliament by Sir Henry Hardinge, the Clerk of the Ordinance who stated that he was not of the opinion that it was economical to employ Civil Architects rather than Military Engineers.

He considered that the construction and maintenance of barracks could be carried out more economically by Officers of the Royal Engineers than by any system of Civil Architects and (civilian) Clerk of Works.

The Royal Engineers were then tasked to build and supervise the construction of barracks across Britain. A system of District Engineers (Lt Colonels and Majors) was established and the view was that Engineer Officers that were stationed in Britain in RE battalions and companies should be tasked to work for the District Engineer, the view taken was that this would be an excellent opportunity for the Engineering Officer to learn the skills they would need on operations/ campaign when sent overseas.

The District Engineers would be assisted by Sapper Draughtsman and Engineer Clerks, later they would also be assisted by Military Foreman of Works (the forerunner to the Clerks of Works (construction) – The first course started in 1839 I believe, I aim to research into that a bit more).

An example of the type of work undertaken is that of the construction of Fulwood Barracks at Preston, this was designed and managed by the Royal Engineers using the District Engineer organisation. The Building works were commenced in July, 1842, and the first stone was laid on the 28th of August, 1843, and being completed by 1848. The entire cost was 137,921 pounds, 2 shillings and 10 pence. During my time at Fulwood it was always pointed out that the build was delivered on time but went £100 over budget. (by modern standards a 0.07% overspend seems a bit of a bargain to be honest!)

Fulwood Barracks main entrance

As we move forward it was felt that there was a need to increase the assistance to the District Engineers, which by the 1880’s were being referred to as the as CRE’s (Commander Royal Engineers) as they had command over the RE units in their districts.. A Royal Engineer review of 1885 made a recommendation to create and an additional 8 Quartermasters for the Corps of Royal Engineers.

At this point in time there was only 6 Quartermasters in the Royal Engineers, the additional 8 Quartermasters would see 2 become added to the existing Quartermasters while the other 6 would be promoted from Military Foreman of Works who were Warrant Officers. The selected Warrant Officers became “Quartermasters of Works Services” and they would be allocated to Districts to assist the CRE and Division Officers in the construction and maintenance of Barracks and Garrisons.

Quartermasters at this time were given honorary rank of Lieutenant on first appointment and then promoted Captain after 10 years of service, promotion to Major was by selection. A Quartermaster was required to retire at age 55.

After that first initial 6 Quartermaster of Work Services in 1885 they were increased in number to 49 by 1914.

While I still have more digging to do to see what the expansion was for the Quartermasters of Works Services and Military Foremen of Works was during the Great War.

The next part of the research is to understand how and when the QM of Works Services progressed onto become the Garrison Engineer. I have some articles and information that show Garrison Engineer appointments existed in India as part of the Military Engineering Services and also in the Salonika Campaign but these posts were for Senior RE Officers (Majors or Lt Colonels) or Senior Civilian Engineers. So more research needed and I have a feeling this is going to require looking in lots of RE Journal articles and perhaps contacting the Indian Army Sappers.

Posted in History | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Busy but still here

Just a very quick update on what is happening. At the moment work and home life is very busy so the work on articles has slowed down. Life on the “Estate” is in the summer busy phase with hay making at the moment and at work I’m starting to prepare for my next posting.

Now that doesn’t mean that things will slow down drastically as the new posting will allow me to do more posts as well as the ability to get out on the ground out in Belgium and France to go looking at the various battlefields.

so please bear with me as at the moment I have a stack of articles in the draft file being worked on or waiting editing.

In the mean time go have a brew and I’ll be with you shortly………

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Officer’s Kit

We are used to seeing modern officers wearing a Sam Browne as a piece of parade kit but during the Great War this was the equipment worn by Officers of all types of units as field equipment. The Officer of the time would be expected to carry a variety of equipment in the field and this changed as the war developed . With this post we are going to look at a couple of different set ups and also how I have developed my kit over the years and also to mention where there are differences in kit and why .

(I also recognise that there were officers sets of 1908 equipment and that officers would at times wear soldiers kit when in the trenches, but the plan is to focus on the type of equipment that would be seen across the war period using the Sam Browne as the principle field equipment.)

CO and Senior officers of the Cameronians Aug 1914

The Sam Browne. Having progressed in my career to being a Warrant officer and then onto being an Officer I have worn a Sam Browne as part of my dress uniform. For the Warhorse ride in 2014 we were provided with uniform but needed to use our own Sam Browne to complete the impression of an early war mounted Sapper officer. While I had been issued with a Sam Browne I also had a cheap copy that I used for horse riding competitions that I had been taking part in as a Army Warrant Officer, I used to compete in Dressage and Show Jumping at novice and inter unit/ station events (not bad for a late comer to this horse riding milarky). This copy was perfect for using on the Warhorse event and also to use as my basis for my RE Officer impression for future events.

The Engineer Training Manual (Drill) has been a really useful document as it defines the kit to be worn/ carried by Officers and Soldiers in the field, this has helped me to refine my kit for the different roles and periods of the Great War.

Single cross strap. The basic set up is the Single Strap Sam Browne with the addition of the leather holster and ammunition pouch for the webley revolver. While on the Warhorse 14 event I also had my sword attached to the sam browne, this was quite common Pre War and in the very early stages of the Great War, but became less common after September 1914. Where I don’t have the sword frog fitted I will normally have the holster on the left hand side. This set up is also the one that I have when I’m on horseback.

This configuration works well and is quite well balanced on the belt and so long as the cross strap is adjusted for load carrying and not for parades it works well. One of the things that I have done with the ammunition pouch is to work out what the weight would be of 12 rounds of .455 pistol ammunition and then add that weight in the form of penny washers in a taped package, this adds an appropriate weight and helps to fill the pouch out appropriately.

Double cross strap. The double strap Sam Browne is stated as the configuration required for field wear by the RE Training Manual. The reason for this is to help to balance the load on the body. The second strap is normally fixed to the front right hand side of the belt by one of 3 methods.

a fixed ring on the belt, either stitched, riveted or both.

a leather loop with a ring, that slides onto the belt

a ring on the back of the holster. (this is the version that I use).

Having regularly worn this set up it is very balanced and even with the added binoculars and case means that it does allow for the equipment to be carried comfortably both when on foot or mounted. The one issue to watch however is to ensure the holster is sufficiently back on the belt that it doesn’t dig in when riding.

An extract from a manual showing the components of the Sam Browne

Belt only. It was not unusual to see officers, when away from the front just wearing the belt of the Sam Browne. While it was a part of the dress regulations for officers to wear a belt with their jackets, the main people that you see in photos with this arrangement is that of Generals (possibly as they were photographed more frequently?).

Sword Frog. I have 2 modern sword frogs and I’ve used these in two ways, the first is to wear on the Sam Browne as required by the regulations but I’ve also used the second frog to be attached to the my Staff Saddle. This would allow me to switch the sword from my belt to saddle for ease of riding. On the War Horse 14 ride I did carry my 1897 pattern sword on the belt even when riding, which was fine but there was times when it was an embuggerance and from that experience I now always aim to carry the sword on the saddle, either using the loop on a shoe case or by using the spare sword frog.

Sapper Officer with Sword Frog on Sam Browne but sword fitted to horse shoe case.
On the Warhorse ride and sword carried on the Sam Browne.

One of variations that you can find is the Cavalry sword frog which has a slightly larger leather back, this was to provide protection to the Officer’s uniform from rubbing from the sword hand-guard. This type of frog can also be used on the officer pattern saddles.

Mk 1 Cavalry Sword Frog

Pistol Holster and ammunition pouch. The standard pistol was the .455″ webley, of a number of variants, but from 1915 onward the principle pistol was the Mk6 Webley. These pistols would be carried on the belt in an angled leather holster. This could be worn on either side of the belt.

The position of the pistol was initially stated as be carried on the right hand side of the belt, but around 1911 the cavalry issued a directive that the holster should be worn on the left hand side.

The rationale was that with the Sword Frog on the left it was too cramped/ tight to have the pistol holster added to the left. However with the cavalry carrying the sword on the saddle it meant that there was space on the belt on that side and the holster should move to allow for easier access and cross-drawing of the pistol. both in mounted and dismounted roles.

When not in the field and as the war progresses you do tend to see the holster becoming more usual on the right hand side.

For my set ups, for single strap Sam Brownes I will have the pistol and holster on the Right Hip and ammo pouch on the left side. With the double strap I have the holser on the left with the ammo pouch on the right side of the buckle.

The Additional Equipment:

The Watch. By rights an officer of the Great War was expected to have a wrist watch, and for that purpose I have a couple of old style wrist watches that I use, generally plain with a brown leather strap. But in addition to that I also have a pocket watch with chain that I have added. The reason for that it would fit with a pre War officer to be using a pocket watch, also my Early War jacket has a small pocket specifically for a pocket watch, so why not.

The Satchel/ musette bag. Just as soldiers are required to carry their personal field kit on them so does the officer. These would have been a private purchase by the officers and would have come in a whole variety of types and styles. The bag on the left of the photo below is often referred to as a Officers Musette Bag and was designed to be worn on the shoulder strap or by clipping to the loops on the Sam Browne belt were the Sword Frog attached.

The musette bag is a great bit of kit and works well when carried on the shoulder strap, however when you use it clipped to the Sam Browne it does have the habit of pulling down on the belt. Having tried this with a single strap Sam Browne several times it was not brilliant to wear so I tend to now wear it using the shoulder strap. It will be worth trying it again with a double strap set up and with pistol and equipment on the opposite side to try and balance it out. The photo of the senior officers of the Cameronians in August 1914 show several of them with this style of bag fitted to the Sam Browne without pulling the belts down so it probably is down to getting the balance just right on the belt.

Musette bags clipped to the Sam Browne sword Frog loops – with the sword and without.

The other bag is an old satchel that I picked up cheap but it allowed me to have an alternative, it was possibly an old fishing kit bag but for an officers satchel for the Great War period it fits really well.

Waterbottle. Until recently I would use a 1903 pattern waterbottle carrier and kidney shaped waterbottle with my set up. While using a 1903 pattern set up isn’t wrong it was more often the Indian Pattern waterbottle that Officers would have carried. Again this was a private purchase item and while the shape of the bottle was standard, the carrying harness/ strap would vary. The Indian Pattern waterbottle was slightly smaller in height to the kidney shaped bottle but was wider, the other main difference was that it was made from aluminium rather than enamelled metal (however I believe that some pre-1900 versions were enamelled steel).

I tend to use a 1903 carrier and waterbottle for riding events as the strap can be worn in a way that has the bottle very secure under the arm when riding, rather than bashing about on your hip or side. If I was doing an Officer of a foot unit then the Indian Pattern would be the first choice.

Binoculars. I have 2 sets of binos from the period, ideal for a Sapper Officer to have when on recce or just to keep an eye on what the Chaps are upto! Both came with cases that were in poor order but have now been repaired. One set is for wearing on a strap across the body and the other has loops to wear on the Sam Browne Belt.

Compass case. There is nothing more dangerous that a Officer with a map and a compass….as the saying goes. There are 2 types shown below. The smaller “pocket watch” looking item is a trench compass and is original. It is fully working and does appear like a pocket watch, its a nice bit of kit and when fitted with a watch chain is very easy to use when on horseback.

The other compass is a reproduction of a marching compass, very similar to the prismatic compasses that most modern soldiers would recognise and use. Again easy to use once you’ve been taught and very accurate. This is carried in a leather case and that would be either on a leather strap over the shoulder and across the body or it would have a clip and again attached to one of the loops on the Sam Browne.

Greatcoat carrier. Officers would carry a cold weather coat, either a great coat, trench coat or mackintosh either in carrier with a shoulder strap or with a set of straps that would clip to the Sam Browne cross straps. Examples that I have seen often replaces the greatcoat with rolled blankets or combinations of the all of the items. The only issue that I would say with the straps that clip to the cross straps is that this would be difficult to take off or put on without assistance or fully taking off the Sam Browne.

Both types of Carrier shown – fixed to cross straps and one on the shoulder strap

This is the a reproduction item from Military History Workshop and is really useful to carry my trench coat. I’m currently having an old and damaged Greatcoat repaired and converted to a Pea Coat and this will be carried using the carrier. neither of my Sam Browne have attachment loops on the rear and I want the convenience of being able to drop kit off with the minimum of fuss.

When mounted the Greatcoat/ trenchcoat can very easily be strapped to the rear of the staff saddle without removing it from the carrier.

Map Case. There are several types of map case that are seen used by officers and these would have been either worn on a leather strap across the body or for the 3 fold pattern case that could be clipped to one of the lower brass rings on the Sam Browne belt.

The one which I use is an original leather case with clear panels marked with a a grid. This case is worn by using a leather strap across the body. However it is a really good to use when on horse back as the clear panel does allow the map to be read very easily and I strap it to the front of the saddle wallets to keep it close on hand.

The 3 fold map case that is seen below is an original from the interwar period and is in need of some repair work particularly the leather work (a project for later this year). This type of map case is seen with both Mounted and foot officers and could be worn on a strap across the body or clipped to one of the rings on the Sam Browne.

Whistle Pouch. The whistle is such an iconic item of the Great War with Officers using it to initiate going over the top, but it also was used for other signals as well. This would be carried by officers, either in a pouch on the cross straps of the Sam Browne or attached to a pocket by a leather tab or length of cord.

Realistically this would be an important item for Platoon/ Troop/ Section officers and for Company Level officers as well. As someone that generally is kitted out as a mounted Major it’s an item that generally I’d keep in a pocket. When doing a RE Field Company officer (on Foot) then I would add it to my Sam Browne.

I suggest that you go to the Highland Subaltern’s youtube site (twitter @1914Subaltern), Ruadhán’s has an excellent video on the use of the Whistle and the signals on his Youtube site, follow the link below – If you haven’t subscribed to Ruadhán sites then you are missing a trick.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5cJkmkMLHw

Summary. You can see there is a lot of kit that can be worn and carried by an Officer. The advantage is that it can be adjusted to suit the job at hand but the downside is that potentially the young officer would look like a christmas tree with so many things hanging off him. There would be a need to test and trial what works and how to configure your kit, For me I have to think if I’m spending time in the mounted role or on foot as with many things with soldiers equipment, once you have spent time in the field with the kit you adjust what you carried and how/where you carried it to be effective and comfortable. So the next time you look at a Sam Browne on parade consider that it is actually an item of field equipment.

References:

http://www.karkeeweb.com/patterns/officers/sam_browne.html

Royal Engineer’s Training Manual (Drill), 1929.

The Highland Subaltern’s Youtube site – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh3mJKJl8rzm2RmiqGMjiDw

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment