Sapper preparations for Beersheba 31 Oct 1917 (Third Battle of Gaza)

In 1917 things were picking up pace in the Middle East against the Ottomans. The Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF), made up of British and Imperial units, had advanced out of Egypt, across the Sinai and had launched attacks against the Ottoman defensive line that was anchored against the town of Gaza.

Wire mesh laid to provide foundation for road construction across the soft sand of the desert, These were laid by Sapper units across the Sinai and on the approaches to Gaza.

The First and Second offensive against Gaza has failed1, but with a change of command from General Murray to General Allenby there was a change of approach.

General Sir Edmund Allenby and Lt General Sir Harry Chauvel at a medal presentation for the Desert Mounted Corps

The aim was now to put together an attack on Beersheba, which was on the eastern end of the Ottoman defensive line, further into the desert and defended by significantly less troops, but to give the impression that this was a feint/ deception as a precursor to another assault on Gaza. The ottomans believed that Beersheba could not be attacked by a large force in strength due to the lack of available water in the area and as such any sizable force would need significant logistical support to sustain it in the field.

And to be honest they were not wrong, Allenby recognised this and realised for his plan to work he would need water supplies as far forwards as possible and stores and supplies as well. The most efficient way for that was to use railways, as they had done for the assaults on Gaza, but for Beersheba there were none existing just as the availability of wells was extremely limited, so everything would need to be built from scratch.

Logistics and Railways.

While it was accepted that water would be the priority it needed to work hand in hand with the creation of the railways. (Water was essential for Men and horses but also for the locomotives, the desert environment put massive limitations on the railway engines so a good supply of water was vital). The Sappers and Egyptian Labour corps of the EEF had already created rail lines from Egypt to the Gaza battle front so it was decided to construct a spur from the Gaza Railway line out into the desert.

The branch line construction started at Rafah 10 days prior to the attack. the line was laid heading east towards Esh Shellal and was constructed by 115th and 116th Field Companys Royal Engineers, half a battalion of Sikh pioneers and 400 labourers from the Egyptian Labour Corps (ELC). The construction of the railway was kept to last safe moment to prevent the Ottoman’s discovery and the majority of the work was carried out at night while the Infantry and Mounted units provided a forward protective screen.

The 266th and the 116th Field Company Royal Engineers then constructed the Imara Station which provided the supply head for 155th Infantry Brigade laydown area. This Brigade then provided the screening troops to allow the construction of line forward to Karm. This would be completed on the 28th Oct and provided the furthest eastern Rail head for supply for the attack, this meant that the British and Imperial forces would have a rail head only 12 miles from Beersheba.

A spur to the rail line was also constructed from Esh Shellal 4 miles south to El Qamie. this would provide supplies to the area occupied by 60 Division.

In 8 days the Sappers with Sikh pioneers and Egyptian labours constructed 26 miles of railway, mainly at night and trying to maintain tactical secrecy.

As mentioned earlier the main task for the Sappers in preparation for the attack on Beersheba was to ensure that water could be provided for the large quantities of Men, Horses and as previously mentioned the railway engines.

The intention was that the Desert Mounted Corps would carry out a flank attack on Beersheba from the East of the town, to achieve this in secret the plan was to push out to the south and then sweep wide to the east hopefully unobserved but this route would take the men and horses the furthest away from water for the longest period.

6th Bn Australian Light Horse – Take note of the quantity of equipment on the saddles of the horses and men. While they were aclimatised to the desert the need for water was key.

On the 21 Oct 1917 the mounted sapper unit, 10 Field Troop RE, headed out into the desert and established a shallow well at Bir el Eseni, once established this would provide water for 9000 men and horses. With that task complete, the Troop headed 8 miles further south to Wadi Khelasa, near the ruins at Khelasa and constructed another shallow well and waterpoint by the close of 22nd Oct. This was already for the Corps to replenish water prior to the last stage of their approach ride to the east of Beersheba.

As the railway line from Rafah pushed forward Sapper units constructed more wells, initially as shallow wells and then enhanced further to deep wells.

Believed to be an early stage shallow well with a lift and force pump attached.

by the 24th Oct 155 Infantry Brigade had taken position at El Imara to provide protection to the rail line construction going forward to Karm. A section (a troop size unit in modern Royal Engineer units) from 436 Field Company RE had constructed wells and a water point for the formation.

by the 26th Oct the remainder of 436 Field Company had constructed wells and water points for 60th Division in the Tell El Fara and El Qamie areas.

Major water point with canvas water troughs in radial around the well and what looks like water tanks being constructed in the distance.

As part of the final preparations for the attack 9 Field Troop RE moved forward to Goz El Basal, just south of the Karm Station on the 27th Oct to construct a well and water point for the Australian Mounted Division who would provide the troops for the forward defence of the rail head and were located at El Baqqar. These troops were in place by the 27/28 Oct.

The final part of the preparation was for 437th and 439th Field Company RE to go forward and construct infantry defences and 21 defensive outposts. These defences help to protect the troops of the Yeomanry when they were attacked by a Turkish force on the morning of the 27th, who were defeated and this allowed construction on the rail head to continue.

THE TURKISH ARMY IN THE SINAI AND PALESTINE CAMPAIGN, 1915-1918 (Q 58657) A Turkish cavalry patrol on the move in Palestine. Copyright: © IWM. Original Source: http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205307837

It can be seen that Sapper units were vital to the operation to attack and take Beersheba, often required to push out well ahead of units to have waterpoints established ready for the troops and horses to arrive.

The Battle of Beersheba on the 31 Oct 1917

The attack was carried out by the following units:

HQ Desert Mounted Corps

ANZAC Mounted Division

Australian Mounted Division

Yeomanry Mounted Division

10th Division less the 30th Brigade (Infantry)

53rd Division with the 30th Brigade (infantry)

60th Division (Infantry)

74th Division (infantry)

The town was attacked from the west by the 60th and 74th Division. The ANZAC Mounted Division moved round to attack from the East.

The aim of the mounted troops was to circle round to the east and to attack from the rear and to secure the towns wells intact.

The attacks by the 60th and 74th initially made good progress but were slowed as the day progressed. It was imperative that the town be taken that day as the soldiers and the horses of the entire Corps had been without water replenishment for nearly 36 hours.

Late in the afternoon of the 31st Oct, the 4th Australian Light Horse Brigade was tasked with attacking Beersheba.

The Australia Light Horse are not a cavalry regiment, but rather a Mounted Infantry Unit, which would normally advance mounted and then dismount and put in the final attack dismounted as convensional infantry.

However the Brigade decided to do something different and rather than dismount they continued mounted and moved from the walk to the Trot onto the Canter and then to the Charge. The Turks were taken by surprise with change of tactics as the Australians managed to break through the defences and to capture the town by 6pm.

The charge of the Light Horse at Beersheba is rightly celebrated by the Australians. Their assault achieved surprise on the Turkish Troops and their German advisors at the cost of 31 Light Horsemen, but it is important not to forget the men of the 60th and 74th Division that had had a hard and thirsty day fighting on the West of the town.

So if you have an opportunity this evening lift a glass to the brave men and horses of the Australian Light Horse, the 60th Division and the 74th division and have a drink on behalf of the dusty and thirsty men and horse who fought at Beersheba in 1917.

Footnotes:

  1. 2nd Gaza was almost a break through but General Murray called a halt and withdrawl just at the point when the battle would have been won. ↩︎
Posted in History, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Signals Telegraph Cable Saddle

Several years ago when I started to learn about the various types of military saddles I would try and find as many images of British Military saddles as I could. Eventually I had built up a fair collection of images of the different types and also of the UP pack saddle with different types of loads fitted.

I eventually came across a rather poor quality image of an Indian Soldier leading a Mule in Gallipoli and it looked as if the Pack saddle on the mule had been modified to hold a reel of telegraph wire. The poor quality of the photo meant that it wasn’t clear if the saddle was one of the following:

  • a modified Pack Saddle
  • a modified UP Saddle (which occasionally happens)
  • A bespoke saddle for signals units

At the time I was helping a couple of historians with some of their research into equipment of cavalry and mounted units and I enquired with them if they had ever seen anything like this before and if they knew what is was?

The responses were pretty poor to be honest, ranging from “I’m not interested in that type of detail” to “it doesn’t look like a cavalry item, so it can’t be important.”

It was a bit of a hard lesson for me and helped to shape some of my views on the relationships between Historians, Battlefield Guides and Reenactors. It also made me start to understand where each of these groups have gaps or limits in knowledge or levels of detail.

Not to be daunted I continued to search for information on the different types of saddles and how they were configured and modified, always keeping an eye out for hopefully a clearer image of the “Cable Saddle”

The break through came over this summer as I was researching the Heliograph bucket for the UP saddle and I came across this really clear image of the Saddle with a Canadian Engineer Unit.

While it seemed to me that saddle configuration may have started as a “Heath Robinson” modification of a UP Pack Saddle it appeared to have become a formal Pack Saddle variant, which may have accounted for the slight variations in the saddles in the two photos. I suspected that the saddle shown in the photo from Gallipoli was probably one of the early versions, while the one shown below is a more refined model. My assumptions may well have been influenced by the quality of image rather than detail of the saddles!

It was purely by chance when I was researching the Heliograph saddle buckets that I got chatting via messenger with the a chap called Jonathan Paynter who had an original set of heliograph and telescope buckets and as we chatted he told me that had done a set of drawings of the Cable Pack Saddle, from this I became aware of the cable types used with the saddle.

It is clear that the saddles shown in the two photos had different types of cable, the photo of the Indian Signaller with the mule has a large drum fitted and a different front arrangement, my initial guess was that this may be D1 type cable. However a bit of research into Telegraph cable types provided some real bonus details. The Royal Canadian Signals Website provided the detail of the differences in the cables, a link to the website is below. From the website it states that D2 cable is a lightweight usage telegraph cable and D3 is heavy weight usage, with D2 cable being ideally dispensed from Pack equipment (Bingo!). It is also interesting to note that D2 Twin cable is available. Having looked at the website details I discounted D1 cable as an option as it is a lighter weight cable and only single strand.

D2 single strand is 20-25 lbs per mile and comes in half mile reels and has a breaking strain of 140lbs, D2 twin is approximately 50 lbs per mile with a breaking strain of 250 lbs.

D3 single is 40-50 lbs per mile with a breaking strain of 196 and D3 Twin is 84 lbs and a breaking strain of 354 lbs. Based on that information the larger reels appear to be the D2 & D3 twin Cable reels.

The chat with Jonathan gave me more details and showed that the saddle would carry upto 6 reels of Cable (D2 or D3 type cable) and these would dispense a single reel out over the back of the Pack Horse/ Mule and would allow the signals team to then place the cable in position. I would also suspect that where twin cable is used they would cut the load to 3 cable reels due to both weight and also the space occupied on the saddle.

The Royal Canadian Signals website also has a cracking photo section and in there I was able to find clear photographs of both versions of the Cable Saddle.

The pattern saddle matches the one in the Gallipoli photograph
a side on view of the cable saddle matching the one shown with the Canadian signals section photo.
Pack horses being training with the Cable Saddle and dispensing the cable

A link to the photo section of the Royal Canadian Signals Website is below, (its a cracking website so please go and have a look round it.) But the real benefit was that it showed that both types of saddle were proper variations of the Cable saddle and both appear to be able to dispense D2 and D3 cable (single and twin). I will make an assumption that the larger reel in the Gallipoli photo is a reel of twin cable.

So what is the purpose of the Telegraph Cable saddle? While the Cable Wagon would rapidly dispense cable along roads and tracks, it would have difficulty moving the cable onto the next stage of the journey going forward. Effectively the Cable wagon would operate at Signal Company/ Squadron level and above, and also with dedicated Cable Laying Units, and they were Divisional level assets. The Cable laying pack horse would be a Brigade level asset and be operated by a Signals Section or Signals Troop connecting Brigade HQ to Regiment/ Battalion HQs and would be able to move over more damaged or constrained terrain. The final connections forward would then be undertaken by men unreeling cable by hand.

Indian Corps Signal Section putting up a telegraph line, Merville, France.
Cable being laid by hand in Palestine

While this may seem like it is a small deviation from my usual focus it does tick a couple of boxes for me. Firstly it is a variation on the pack saddle and part of the UP saddle family.

Secondly and importantly it is another element of information that debunks the assertion that Engineering can not be carried out from horseback. With Signalling, at this point in time, being an Engineering task this is an almost perfect example of engineering being delivered (dispensed) from Horse Back.

It’s surprising what you find when you go searching for other things!

References:

Royal Canadian Signals Website:

Posted in Blog, History | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Refurbished 1912 UP (Swivel Tree) Saddle

Since I started doing Great War riding and re-enacting/ living history one of the things that was always pushed was the need to ensure that I had an appropriate saddle. Be that an Officers pattern saddle or an 1902 UP saddle.

The more that I got into Great War Living History and the more that learned I found that there were various patterns of the 1902 saddle and also that the Universal Pattern saddle had evolved over time, all of which made sense.

As part of that learning process I encountered the 1912 Universal Pattern Saddle. While this looks very similar to the 1902 Saddle the difference is that the Steel Arches of the Saddle are hinged and this allows the wooden boards of the saddle to move and rotate in a limited manner. The purpose of this was to create a Saddle that could fit all varieties of horse and mule. Where a unit with 1902 UP saddles would need a variety of sized saddles (generally Medium (Size 2) and Large sized arches (Size 3)) the adoption of the 1912 UP saddle was meant to do away with the need for holding spare saddles or arches of different sizes.

For Example a Royal Engineer Field Squadron was meant to hold saddles sized at the percentage rate of:

  • Size 0 – 0% (this size of saddle was only issued to Mounted Infantry who tended to be mounted on Cob sized horses (less than 15 hands high)
  • Size 1 – 10% (Small Horses)
  • Size 2 – 50% (Medium Horses)
  • Size 3 – 40% (Large Horses)

While this system was fine in peacetime or early in conflicts it was recognised that horses may lose condition, or change the muscle definition when worked/ exercised. in the initial instance some of this variation in the horse can be managed with the way that the horse blanket is folded but this is not the ideal. Also there is the fact that when remounts are provided (horse battle casualty replacements) they may not be of the same size as the horse that they replaced and as such would need different saddles.

The aim was that the 1912 UP saddle would solve this issue by providing a saddle that was “flexible” to meet the sizing and any changes in the physical condition of all horses.

However it wasn’t widely issued with British Units. There are comments that state that the Swivel connection was a point of weakness in the saddle and as such it wasn’t really adopted. This isn’t the case. Firstly the saddle was widely used by the Australian mounted units, particularly the Australian Light Horse and it was viewed as an excellent saddle, very suitable and robust for military usage, both fully loaded and on it’s own. The second, and probably the main reason is that by the time it was accepted for use by the Army the Great War had started and the reality was that the Army already had stocks of the 1902 UP saddles and their components. Also the fixed Arches of the 1902 were considerably easier to manufacture quickly and less complicated when constructing the saddles in comparison to the 1912 UP..

In terms of the Australians, they would have less stock of the older pattern saddles and may well have been in the process of “re-tooling” for the 1912 when the war came and the expansion of the Australian Army and in particular the Mounted Units it would have made sense to just make the new pattern of saddle.

It is certainly the case that most examples of the 1912 tend to be found in Australia.

Over the last 18 months I’ve been linking in with Gerard Hogan in Australia, a Saddler and historian that is working with the Australian Army Museum, and the opportunity arose to obtain a 1912 UP Saddle for my own collection, both in terms of being able to use it for riding as well as for Living History displaying.

The basics of the saddle, such as the arches and boards were originals (from different original saddles) but the leather work would be new. I was asked if I wanted the leather work marked to a particular unit, so I kept it basic and asked that Gerard mark it with his own marks and also with unit marks appropriate to an Australian unit.

To that end there are stamp marks with Broad Arrows but with GH stamped next to them (Gerard Hogan) and also all parts stamped for 10th Battery Australian Field Artillery.

Part of the refurbishment process is to do some treatment work on the saddle. I was under very specific orders not to stain the leather dark, but to keep it the light tan colour as was the case in the Great War, the darkening of the leather was tend to a mix of it being used over a 100 years and also it not being properly cleaned!

So the orders were to make sure that all of the leather was fully coated with dubbing, I have been using Elico’s Gold Label Brown Dubbin, which has been ideal as it is easy to work into the leather.

So what is the plan for the saddle? The aim is to use it for riding and displays. My horse, Rosey, has high withers and back length that does not suit any of the UP saddles that I currently have:

  • The 1890 UP is 24″ long
  • The 1902 UP is 23″ long
  • The 1902 UP (HC variant) is 22″ long and fits her back but not her withers and shape of her sides.
  • The 1902 UP (Indian variants) are 21″ long, they fit by length but are too narrow.
  • The 1912 UP is 21″ long and has the movement in the boards to hopefully fit her.

The 1912 will also fit Meg the mule. Also it allows me to show the variation and the evolution of the saddles over time. I will probably look to set the 1912 up as either a typical fit out for Australian Light Horse or for a Driver with the Sappers, Gunners or Army Service Corps, with a Greatcoat strapped to the front of the saddle and plain shoe case (and the Rifle to be slung across the back of the rider.)

Overall, a great addition and once I’m back in the UK full time I’ll be able to get it set up appropriately and hopefully get out for a plod in the local area with either Meg or Rosey using the saddle. More to come……

Posted in Blog, Refurbishments | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Signals Equipment and the UP Saddle

During the Great War, signals was an element of Royal Engineers with some parts devolved or shared out to different cap badges including the Cavalry.

Now signals are not a particular interest of mine but they do have some very particular elements of equipment that link into the Mounted Units or have resulted in some interesting horse and saddle equipment.

I will confess that the idea for this post came about when I came across an interesting photo that was unusual for a couple of reasons.

The reason that I first look at this image as it is so unusual to find a rider of a horse in the Great war to be wearing 1908 Equipment (Webbing). The next thing was that item that was strapped next to the rifle bucket, I’d never come across that before and my initial curiosity thought that I may well have been a trials piece of kit or something linked with the Hotchkiss Machine gun, but I couldn’t find anything that related to that.

It was purely by accident that I came across another photo with a similar set up and it referred to it as “Signals Flags Bucket”.

With a little bit more digging and research I found out that this was partially true. The reality is that they form part of a set that are fitted to a saddle and they are for the Heliograph signals equipment. The buckets are fitted to each side of the saddle and are designed to carry the heliograph tripod, signals telescope, and signals flags, thus allowing a Cavalry Regiment to carry signalling equipment in the field.

Signallers of the East Riding Yeomanry using a Heliograph and observing telescope in 1917

I went looking to get some more information on the heliograph equipment and manage to track down the information on the buckets in the List of Changes (LoC) and as part of that it had 2 excellent images of the buckets loaded with equipment fitted to a UP Saddle.

The mirrors and the “headset” of the heliograph would be stored in a leather case with a leather or webbing strap and were carried by the signaller while mounted.

I found that there is a very good facebook group that deals with the Heliograph equipment, of which there are a couple of posts about the use of the Heliograph by mounted units and even some images of the buckets, the photo below is a brilliant image of the two buckets, in what looks like excellent condition. They are owned by a chap called Jonathan Paynter and he states that they are stamped 1914. The Facebook group is the British Heliograph Club https://www.facebook.com/groups/776510812960897/

The left is for the telescope stand and signals flags, the right is for the Heliograph tripod. The Straps/loops at the top of each bucket would have gone around the rear arch of the UP Saddle, allowing the bucket to hang down, in the same way as the Rifle Bucket and the RE Tool Bucket does. On both you can see the leather steadying strap (in the centre of the buckets) that would have reached across to the Girth strap of the saddle and leather loop at the end of the strap would have allowed the buckets to be secured/tied by having the surcingle strap pass through the loop.

On the left bucket the strap at the bottom of the bucket is a short retaining strap to help tie the flag bucket to the Rifle bucket next to it. On the right hand bucket centre strap you will notice a smaller loop, this is to allow the scabbard of the Cavalry Sword to pass through and again this also adds to the stability of the equipment on the saddle. Admittedly that is quite hard to see in the LOC photo above as that has the picket peg secured above the sword scabbard (as it should be) but also over the top of the leather loop on the heliograph tripod bucket

The heliograph was an excellent piece of equipment and was used through out the army from the Victorian period and the Survey Squadrons of the Royal Engineers were still using it through to the 1980s when they were out doing large scale survey works.

The size and weight of the equipment also made sense that Cavalry units should have access to it and that it should be available in the field rather than being in the unit baggage/ stores wagons. From what I can find it was issued at the rate of 2 heliograph sets per cavalry regiment.

Australian Light Horse signals team 1918 in Palestine
Unit unknown but these signallers are only using the Flags buckets. the lack of rifle buckets on the saddles suggests a mounted infantry unit (they often slung their rifles on their backs)

So to come back to my original puzzle, I still don’t have an answer as to this rider wearing 1908 equipment but I have at least learned about what the additional equipment is, and also learned that whoever loaded the kit put the heliograph tripod in the wrong bucket! Oh well everyday is a school day and it is always great to use old photos to broaden your knowledge through investigation and research.

Posted in Blog, History | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A great place to stay on the Somme – Le Logis d’Anne-Sophie

Firstly this post is not a “paid for post” or sponsored post but simply a personal recommendation for somewhere that offered a great place to stay and brilliant service.

A few months ago I was down on the Somme and decided to stay overnight and didn’t want to stay in Albert. I was tracking down several of the “Men of Hartshorne”, visiting Delville Wood and also trying to locate 2 river crossing points where 3rd Field Sqn RE put in bridges for the Battle of Amiens on the 8th August 1918. So it was a visit with plenty of things to do.

Having searched for somewhere to stay I found a cracking place at the village of Chuignolles. The property is a very impressive country house and there are 2 rooms for renting and the owners provide an excellent breakfast.

Le Logis d’Anne-Sophie, is a great place. It’s quiet and very comfortable and the use of the lounge with the very warm open fire was just what I needed so that I could spread out the maps and books while I planned my next day activities.

It is Bed and Breakfast, and I must say it is a bloody good breakfast – Home made Brioche, with home made plumb jam which I can highly recommend . The village is quiet and you may need to head to the surrounding villages and towns for an evening meal but as I had brought my own evening food (due to being on this bloody diet) that wasn’t a problem and the owners set a place on the dining table for me to eat.

It was also interesting chatting with Anne-Sophie’s husband, Bruno, that he mentioned that the house had been used by the Germans in both wars. This was particularly interesting as some of the Armoured Cars of the 17th Armoured Car Battalion came through the village on the morning of the 8th August 1918 and engaged a German MG Company in the village, considering the house is on the main junction in the village the chances are that the house was in the thick of it. It would be an interesting side project at some point to research into the events of that day and what happened in the village.

Overall I can say that Le Logis d’Anne-Sophie is probably an ideal place to stay if you are looking at researching and exploring the Amiens 1918 battle area and if you just want a quiet but very comfortable place to stay when visiting the Somme area at any time of the year then give them a visit.

https://www.booking.com/hotel/fr/le-logis-d-anne-sophie.fr.html?label=gog235jc-1FCAsoTUIWbGUtbG9naXMtZC1hbm5lLXNvcGhpZUgNWANoFYgBAZgBDbgBGcgBDNgBAegBAfgBAogCAagCA7gCzJTYsgbAAgHSAiQxNTUxNTVlZS02MWNiLTQ0MzItOTc3Mi00ZTFmMzVjMGY4YWbYAgXgAgE&sid=98f8053064a3dbb25d2ec13fa99f028c&aid=356980&ucfs=1&arphpl=1&checkin=2024-11-09&checkout=2024-11-10&dest_id=-1420349&dest_type=city&group_adults=1&req_adults=1&no_rooms=1&group_children=0&req_children=0&hpos=1&hapos=1&sr_order=popularity&nflt=sth%3D2&srpvid=2a5476ba47840301&srepoch=1716915857&all_sr_blocks=750209202_331360072_2_1_0&highlighted_blocks=750209202_331360072_2_1_0&matching_block_id=750209202_331360072_2_1_0&sr_pri_blocks=750209202_331360072_2_1_0__10580&from=searchresults#hotelTmpl

or contact they direct – logis.annesophie@gmail.com

Posted in Blog, Men of Hartshorne, Personal takes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment